1996

THE GREAT FLOOD AND INDIA ABROAD

LONDON LETTER

BY: T.R.K

It is the last week of January and the Great Flood is here. Most of Northern Europe is under several metres of water. It is an unbelievable sight :archetypal German cities like Cologne and Bonn are set adrift in a landscape of water, although they always appeared as if born fully-formed in Gothic stone-cladding, solidly bulwarked against even the great Noye's Fludde. It is not inconceivable to imagine the Ark on the flooded horizon wending its way through German, Dutch, Belgian and French towns and villages with just the church spires showing above water, collecting all living species for Noah's great genetic bank.

   Europe was unprepared for this sudden  downpour, this Biblical deluge. In Holland, a generation of engineers had transformed these lowlands lying well below sea-level in to a relatively safe haven, by building a skilful labyrinth of dykes and dams and gentle coaxing away of the direction of its rivers. A newer generation of environmentalists put a stop to all that, persuading the authorities that these man-made defences were environmentally intrusive, and ecologically damaging and unfriendly, and that they disfigured the land. They accused the grandfathers of dam builders of over-zealousness. Now the dykes have been found to be insufficient and giving way all over Netherlands. In one night on the 30th of January, some 100,000 people had to be evacuated from town and villages to the relative safety of high ground. Environmental moralists seem to have lost their high ground, at least for the time being.
France is in the throes of a similar downpour, with 40,000 homes destroyed in the Ardenne alone.

   It is worth speculating, ensconced in the safety of an imaginary Mount Ararat, how the Western world was so readily pejorative in their pronouncements about the great earthquake of Kobe in Japan. Tens of thousands of citizens of the most prosperous and advanced country on the planet, it was alleged, were left to cope for themselves, without food or shelter in a bitter Japanese winter. The rescue efforts were derisory and arrived too late. This would never happen in the West. The Californian earthquake, exactly a year earlier to the date was a perfect example of the speedy mobilization of rescue and re-housing and re-construction. What the West conveniently forgot to notice was the exemplary patience of the Japanese, a total absence of looting, a civic sense of mutual responsibility that drove even the much-feared Japanese Mafia to forge a remarkable link and provide aid on a significant scale. I am by now used to the well-meaning derision from our experts about floods and typhoons in Bangladesh, the Philippines and China. And yet a night of heavy snowfall in Northern England grounded half the country in a helpless gridlock of ice and resulted in several associated deaths.  An internationally important city like London is wholly unprepared for sustained snowfall. Its basic services are pared down to the bone, and chaos ensues within a day.


   As a columnist I have to read a whole lot of British, American and European newspapers and periodicals. I find it amazing that so very little is written about India, the largest democracy on earth, still experimenting with its reforms and tinkering with its democratic institutions in what often appears to be a free-for-all. My one week's news-watch during late January yielded just a few items: several of them were not about India at all, but  about Indian affairs in England.

   The Taj Mahal, if a report in the Sunday Times is to be believed is about to be the "centre-piece  of a tourist theme-park, complete with fake moonlight, cable cars, fast food restaurants and a boating lake. "Arguably the discolouring and erosion caused to this magical monument by industrial pollution has caused deep dismay worldwide. An Indian "environmentalist lawyer" Mahesh Chandra Mehta (obviously of a new legion of combative foot-soldiers of the movement) says that he has found greater support abroad for his Save the Taj Campaign than in India. The Sunday Times reports that vested interests at all levels seem to be saying that a "perfect Taj Mahal is a luxury they cannot afford". They want to squeeze the last ounce of its tourist potential to create a micro-economic boom in Agra.

   A musical soiree featuring the South Indian classical violin maestro Lakshminarayana Subramaniam and the jazz legend and violinist Stephan Grapelli at London's Albert Hall on Wednesday 18 January was the subject of a full page review in the Arts section of the Daily Telegraph. "Mani" Subramaniam, like Ravi Shankar before him and a whole generation of Indian musicians since, have astutely discovered and experimented with a free format of interaction, a musical chit-chat, generously termed "global fusion" and found themselves performing on an international stage. Mani Subramaniam, a gifted classical violinist has improvised in a non-classical free format, linking "melodic and rhythmic structures" of the Indian music to the "harmony and counterpoint" of Western music. He has played alongside jazz greats like Herbie Hancock and Joe Sample; and with Yehudi Menuhin under the baton of Zubin Mehta. I understand that Subramaniam now lives in Los Angeles, not Madras.

   I recall the 60s and early 70s experimentation in East Meets West musical formats between Ravi Shankar and Yehudi Menuhin. A climate of enormous goodwill and great musicianship on both sides enabled them to speak to each other musically, although their languages remained exclusive of each other. Much more daring and somewhat surrealistic was the reading of Baudelaire's Les Fleurs des Mal by Yvette Mimieaux, the golden girl of French Films to Ustad Ali Akbar Khan's Sarod, a medley that is merely of historical interest now. The great and the famous musical egg-heads across a cultural and musical divide somehow felt compelled to perform on a single stage, but in disparate voices. Often these cross-cultural jam-sessions failed woefully. "Indo-Jazz", a term that a gifted publicity man invented, has remained the most enduring of these syncretisms. It is as breath-taking as a headlong ski-run to hear Joe Harriot on the saxophone, John Meyer on the violin taking turns with a quintet of Indian instrumentalists on the flute, Veena and Sitar. They slide effortlessly from what is almost a classical fugue to haunting trad-jazz, intimations of the big band sounds, with the percussive tabla syncopating this anarchical but celebratory uproar.
   
   Mid-January also saw international cricketer and playboy Imran Khan's "public conversion to Islamic fundamentalism", and reputedly heading for political high office in Pakistan. Wearing the "rough woollen cloaks of the Punjab" in place of designer suits, Imran's conversion began after an epic walk with armed Afghan tribesman two years ago. In a long article in the Evening Standard of London on the 13 January, written with considerable sadness and irony, the British Labour M.P. George Galloway mourns the passing of Imran the lovable internationalist and the birth of a "holy warrior" who has repudiated all things Western. Galloway says that Imran has "perhaps inadvertently walked into this dangerous precinct" and he concludes that "he might merely be a lipstick on the ugly face of another dictatorship".

   The Independent (a non-partisan broadsheet going through a fall in circulation and just saved from a certain closure by a Mirror Group Newspapers investment) has written a leader about the embattled Hare Krishna temple in the midst of a sleepy English hamlet. The original planning permission for this temple was obtained for a "theological college" for the International Society for Krishna Consciousness in 1973. The temple now attracts thousands of Hindus seasonally six times a year during religious festivities. The village of Letchmore Heath is naturally outraged, says the Independent. The local Authority is considering an extension of planning permission and a proposal by the temple for an imaginative scheme to build their own road to the nearest highway, bypassing the village altogether. The leader says that at best the planning law is an obtuse instrument, but this "very obtuseness also suits it to the English tradition of compromise and the Hindu tradition of syncretism." The cautionary conclusion is that a win for the temple would be a warning to other sleepy villages of England not to be as tolerant as Letchmore Heath.

   I have just missed the "Festival of Films" of Yavar Abbas organized by Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan in London. Yavar Abbas the film maker is riding high on critical approval from the late Satyajit Ray (who liked "the truth of observation and its sincerity") and universal praise from the British and European cine-culture aesthetes who write in influential papers. Abbas's India, My India and Mother Ganges have been called variously: "beautiful and human"; "ravishingly beautiful" and as "real-life" films portraying India from within. I also understand that Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, once the bastion of K.M.Munshi and Leela Munshi, the legendary political duo and Hindu revivalists of the Nehru era, has been active here for decades. I still recall reading Bhavan's Journal alongside copies of Time and the Reader's Digest in my youth and being strangely drawn to a much heralded "new dawn" of Vedic and Puranic Hinduism.


1542 words

TOP

Reviews Index >>